home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1478>
- <title>
- June 05, 1989: A NATO Balancing Act
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- June 05, 1989 People Power:Beijing-Moscow
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 39
- A NATO Balancing Act
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Bush comes up with positive ideas on arms control and trade
- </p>
- <p>By Dan Goodgame
- </p>
- <p> George Bush's political gifts include a keen sense of
- balance: when he finds himself out on a limb, he usually edges
- back to a less shaky perch. After finally realizing that his
- Administration's less than enthusiastic reaction to Mikhail
- Gorbachev's headline-catching arms-control gambits was
- alienating the NATO allies he will meet with this week in
- Brussels, the President decided a more positive response was
- required.
- </p>
- <p> It showed up last week in a bath of warm rhetoric toward
- Gorbachev -- quite a turnabout from presidential spokesman
- Marlin Fitzwater's denunciation of the Soviet leader two weeks
- ago as a "drugstore cowboy" on arms control, long on talk and
- short on action. In an interview last week with European
- journalists, Bush insisted that his attitude toward Gorbachev's
- initiatives was "not begrudging."
- </p>
- <p> Later the President spent hours personally inserting
- "positive" language into the graduation speech he delivered at
- the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn. The address
- was the fourth in a series summing up the conclusions of his
- Administration's vaunted review of major foreign policy issues.
- While in his three previous speeches he had voiced stern
- warnings against being taken in by Soviet peace talk, Bush now
- praised Gorbachev for "being forthcoming" in negotiations on
- conventional forces in Europe. He emphasized that "our policy
- is to seize every -- and I mean every -- opportunity to build
- a better, more stable relationship with the Soviet Union."
- </p>
- <p> One such opportunity would be the Brussels meeting, and as
- Bush headed across the Atlantic, he considered springing an
- eye-catching arms-control proposal at the NATO summit that would
- not only steal some of Gorbachev's thunder but also, perhaps,
- help heal a deep rift within the Western alliance. In the words
- of one of its architects, it would be a "real attention getter":
- a reduction of up to 10% of the 340,000 U.S. troops in Europe,
- with corresponding cuts in NATO aircraft and helicopters, if the
- Soviets agree to reduce their conventional forces to the levels
- the West has proposed. He is also expected to relax sanctions
- on trade with the Soviets imposed by the U.S. after the Red Army
- invaded Afghanistan.
- </p>
- <p> The need for a bold step had been gnawing at Bush for some
- time, but it really sank in when French President Francois
- Mitterrand visited the President's vacation home in
- Kennebunkport, Me., two weeks ago. Mitterrand warned, as have
- other NATO leaders and U.S. diplomats, that the Administration
- was riling European public opinion by reacting so negatively to
- the Soviet leader's arms-control offers.
- </p>
- <p> Bush summoned his top advisers and told them he wanted
- changes, including more upbeat speeches and some arms proposals
- of his own. As National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft bluntly
- explained after Bush's Coast Guard speech, "The President felt
- he appeared too negative before, so he's trying to appear more
- positive now." Other White House officials added that Moscow had
- made "major concessions" in its latest offer to cut tanks and
- other conventional weapons. They pointed out, moreover, that the
- Soviets had done so "in a serious way, at the bargaining table"
- in Vienna, rather than in splashy public pronouncements.
- </p>
- <p> A U.S. troop cutback would pose few military risks. In
- fact, in their latest offer in Vienna, the Soviets came close
- to accepting Western proposals for reducing their tanks and
- other conventional weapons. If those negotiations lead to an
- agreement on conventional arms, the way would be open to
- East-West talks on the most divisive issue within the Western
- alliance: the reduction of short-range nuclear missiles.
- </p>
- <p> Bush, along with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher,
- is convinced that rushing into missile negotiations with the
- Soviets before a conventional-arms pact is struck would be a
- mistake. But West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl has been
- pressing for a quick start to missile talks to shore up his
- shaky domestic political position.
- </p>
- <p> Bush's emerging arms-control strategy is designed to offer
- both a carrot and a stick to the West Germans. The carrot is a
- quicker start to missile-reduction talks, even though the U.S.
- will continue to insist on keeping some short-range nukes as an
- essential deterrent to Soviet attack. The stick is a threat to
- pull out even more U.S. troops from West Germany, which Kohl
- opposes. "What we have to do," says a State Department official,
- "is show the Germans that we have ideas for getting a
- conventional-arms agreement fairly quickly, so they could then
- get the talks they want on short-range nuclear weapons."
- </p>
- <p> Whether or not NATO manages to heal the rift over
- short-range nuclear missiles, there has been remarkable progress
- on balancing Soviet and Western conventional forces -- and the
- President will now be able to take some credit for it.
- Balancing, after all, is one of the things George Bush does
- best.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-